Phipps v rochester corporation 1955 qb 450
WebbGlasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44. Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450) Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council [2001] 1 WLR 1082. Bourne Leisure Ltd v Marsden [2009] EWCA Civ 671. Skilled visitors: WebbPhipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450, considered Thompson v Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd (2005) 214 ALR 452; [2005] HCA 19; B54 of 2004, 21 April 2005, considered Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1979-80) 146 CLR 40, …
Phipps v rochester corporation 1955 qb 450
Did you know?
Webb20 maj 2024 · 5 minutes know interesting legal matters Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 QBD (UK Caselaw) Show more Tort Law - Causation marcuscleaver 42K views 5 years ago … WebbThe person responsible for the condition of the premises is he who is in actual possession of them for the time being, whether he is the owner or not, for it is he who has the …
WebbPhipps v Rochester Corporation (1955) and . Glasgow Corporation v Taylor (1922)) and using the template used for Jolley, produce your own key cases. Author: OCR Created Date: 06/20/2024 07:13:00 Title: A Level Law Learner resource 4 Occupiers' Liability - landmark case Keywords: Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 Tort law – Negligence – Liability for injury Facts Two children passed across grassland which was part of a building site located on a housing estate that was in the process of being developed by the defendants. Visa mer Two children passed across grassland which was part of a building site located on a housing estate that was in the process of being developed by the defendants. … Visa mer The legal issue, in this case, was whether the Corporation was liable for the injury caused to the injured child. It was particularly important to weigh to whether the … Visa mer Children, as a class of stakeholder, were impliedly licenced to play on grasslands. The court considered the trench to hold danger that children would not have … Visa mer
WebbHowever, the law recognises that ‘it would not be socially desirable if parents were, as a matter of course, able to shift the burden of looking after their children from their own shoulders to those of persons who happen to have accessible bits of land’ (Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450, 472, per Devlin J). WebbPhipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 Plumb v Jeyes Sanitary Compounds (1937) Pollard v Tesco Stores [2006] EWCA Civ 393 Ponting v Noakes (1849) 2 QB 281 Poole Borough Council v GN [2024] UKSC 25 – General Duty of Care Poole Borough Council v GN [2024] UKSC 25 – Public Duty of Care. R
Webb17 nov. 2024 · Phipps v Rochester Corporation (1955): A Case Summary by Finlawportal Team November 17, 2024 Case name & citation: Phipps v Rochester Corporation (1955) …
WebbPhipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 by Lawprof Team Key point Where an occupier can reasonably expect the parental supervision of young children, they do not … grant gordon birch goldWebbpersons who happen to have accessible bits of land’ (Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450, 472, per Devlin J). Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] C – agd 5 … chip beef dip for bread bowlsWebbPhipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450. A 5 year old boy was walking across some open ground with his 7 year old sister. He was not accompanied by an adult. He … grant gordon childhood trustWebbPhipps v Rochester Corporation The Calgarth Some questions in this exercise may have more than one correct answer. To answer such questions correctly, you must select all … grant gopher reviewsWebbIn Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 a 5-year-old was walking, with his 7-year-old sister, across some land owned by the defendant, which was under development. The 5-year-old fell into a trench dug for such purposes, and was injured. grant gordon picksWebbNorthern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris (1996-7) 188 CLR 313 Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 Podrebersek v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34 Rabbit v Roberts, unreported decision, SASC (Full Court) 11 . 2 December 1996 RTA v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330 chip beef dip in bread bowlWebbPhipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 (ICLR) Pickett v British Rail Engineering (BAILII: [1978] UKHL 4 ) [1980] AC 136 Pigney v Pointers' Transport Services Ltd [1957] 1 WLR 1121; [1957] 2 All ER 807 grant gordon ucalgary